FSIGX vs. GSGDX
FSIGX (Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund) and GSGDX (Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund) are both mutual funds - FSIGX is a Investment Grade Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while GSGDX is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX returned 2.10%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for GSGDX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction.
Performance
FSIGX vs. GSGDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSIGX achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than GSGDX's -0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FSIGX has underperformed GSGDX with an annualized return of 2.10%, while GSGDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.40% annualized return.
FSIGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.84%
GSGDX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.37%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 2.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FSIGX vs. GSGDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.48% | 7.65% | 1.79% | 6.82% | -13.30% | -0.67% | 9.71% | 9.75% | -0.15% | 4.39% |
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | -0.82% | 8.23% | 1.93% | 8.81% | -17.33% | -0.97% | 10.12% | 16.83% | -2.55% | 6.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSIGX and GSGDX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2008 | 0.91 |
The correlation between FSIGX and GSGDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSIGX vs. GSGDX — Risk / Return Rank
FSIGX
GSGDX
FSIGX vs. GSGDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) and Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSIGX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 0.88 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 2.67 | -0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSIGX vs. GSGDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSIGX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum GSGDX drawdown of -23.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIGX and GSGDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSIGX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -23.48% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -3.52% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.20% | -6.02% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -23.48% | +5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | -23.48% | +5.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -2.80% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -3.86% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 1.16% | +0.06% |
Volatility
FSIGX vs. GSGDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund (FSIGX) is 1.02%, while Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund (GSGDX) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that FSIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSGDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSIGX | GSGDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.11% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.03% | 3.54% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.89% | 4.41% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 6.84% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 6.40% | -1.37% |
Dividends
FSIGX vs. GSGDX - Dividend Comparison
FSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than GSGDX's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSIGX Fidelity Series Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.97% | 4.24% | 4.01% | 4.00% | 2.37% | 1.88% | 6.32% | 3.09% | 3.20% | 2.86% | 4.32% | 3.07% |
GSGDX Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund | 4.51% | 4.75% | 3.94% | 3.52% | 2.74% | 5.10% | 4.18% | 5.89% | 3.56% | 3.19% | 3.38% | 3.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, FSIGX and GSGDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GSGDX has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to FSIGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIGX dropped -18.22% vs GSGDX's -23.48%.
FSIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSIGX and GSGDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer