PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSIDX vs. FZROX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSIDX achieves a 13.18% return, which is significantly higher than FZROX's 10.41% return.


FSIDX

1D
0.36%
1M
0.66%
YTD
13.18%
6M
12.90%
1Y
23.21%
3Y*
15.17%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
9.97%

FZROX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.62%
YTD
10.41%
6M
9.30%
1Y
26.02%
3Y*
21.31%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSIDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I
13.18%12.99%11.46%9.45%-9.90%18.98%11.25%22.47%-6.58%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
10.41%17.23%23.94%26.20%-19.21%26.00%20.51%31.15%-12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIDX and FZROX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2018

0.88

The correlation between FSIDX and FZROX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSIDX vs. FZROX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIDX
FSIDX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FSIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FSIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FZROX
FZROX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FZROX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZROX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZROX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FZROX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZROX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) and Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSIDXFZROXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.38

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

3.08

+1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.41

13.77

+3.64

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the FZROX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIDX and FZROX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIDX drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, which is greater than FZROX's maximum drawdown of -34.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIDX and FZROX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSIDXFZROXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.94%

-34.96%

-23.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.78%

-8.89%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.55%

-19.38%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

-25.12%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.44%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.32%

-5.48%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.98%

-0.60%

Volatility

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) is 2.59%, while Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund (FZROX) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FSIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSIDXFZROXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

4.82%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

10.10%

-3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.49%

12.88%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

17.53%

-6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.44%

20.13%

-7.69%

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FZROX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSIDX vs. FZROX - Dividend Comparison

FSIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%, more than FZROX's 0.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSIDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I
7.06%7.95%5.25%5.70%4.22%8.42%5.67%6.69%8.18%6.59%4.92%6.37%
FZROX
Fidelity ZERO Total Market Index Fund
0.93%1.02%1.16%1.36%1.57%1.25%1.27%1.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSIDX and FZROX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZROX has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FSIDX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIDX dropped -58.94% vs FZROX's -34.96%.

FSIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSIDX and FZROX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer