FSIDX vs. AOBLX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

FSIDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I) and AOBLX (Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FSIDX returned 9.47%/yr vs 9.94%/yr for AOBLX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSIDX charges 0.72%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for AOBLX.

Performance

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSIDX having a 13.56% return and AOBLX slightly lower at 12.92%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSIDX having a 9.47% annualized return and AOBLX not far ahead at 9.94%.

FSIDX

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 10.90%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 1Y: 20.82%
• 3Y*: 14.32%
• 5Y*: 8.31%
• 10Y*: 9.47%

AOBLX

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -0.42%
• 6M: 10.23%
• YTD: 12.92%
• 1Y: 27.47%
• 3Y*: 16.11%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 9.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSIDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I	13.56%	12.99%	11.46%	9.45%	-9.90%	18.98%	11.25%	22.47%	-4.43%	11.26%
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A	12.92%	19.59%	9.46%	15.00%	-14.64%	15.10%	13.15%	21.75%	-4.63%	14.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FSIDX and AOBLX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2003	0.89

The correlation between FSIDX and AOBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSIDX vs. AOBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSIDX

FSIDX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FSIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FSIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FSIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FSIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FSIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

AOBLX

AOBLX Risk / Return Rank: 93
AOBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AOBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AOBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AOBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
AOBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) and Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSIDX	AOBLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.76	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.53	3.93	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.50	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.65	4.30	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.30	19.75	-4.45

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSIDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the AOBLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSIDX and AOBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSIDX drawdown since its inception was -58.94%, which is greater than AOBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSIDX and AOBLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSIDX	AOBLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.94%	-36.70%	-22.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.78%	-6.42%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.55%	-13.52%	+0.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.10%	-20.48%	+3.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.01%	-24.31%	-5.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.52%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.31%	-3.80%	-2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	1.39%	-0.01%

Volatility

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) is 2.08%, while Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A (AOBLX) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that FSIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSIDX	AOBLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.08%	3.10%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	7.96%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.42%	10.03%	-1.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.99%	11.17%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	11.33%	+1.06%

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSIDX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than AOBLX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSIDX vs. AOBLX - Dividend Comparison

FSIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than AOBLX's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOBLX Victory Pioneer Balanced Fund Class A	3.20%	3.48%	2.28%	1.52%	2.97%	8.33%	4.31%	5.78%	9.70%	9.22%	2.51%	3.97%
FSIDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I	6.94%	7.95%	5.25%	5.70%	4.22%	8.42%	5.67%	6.69%	8.18%	6.59%	4.92%	6.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSIDX and AOBLX in my portfolio?

FSIDX and AOBLX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSIDX or AOBLX?

AOBLX has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to FSIDX (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSIDX dropped -58.94% vs AOBLX's -36.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AOBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.