FSHGX vs. RPHIX
FSHGX (Fidelity SAI High Income Fund) and RPHIX (RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FSHGX returned 4.67%/yr vs 4.63%/yr for RPHIX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSHGX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RPHIX.
Performance
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSHGX achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly higher than RPHIX's 1.76% return.
FSHGX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- —
RPHIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 3.54%
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHGX Fidelity SAI High Income Fund | 3.81% | 10.26% | 9.79% | 10.82% | -12.03% | 2.72% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 1.76% | 4.76% | 6.71% | 5.87% | 2.97% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSHGX and RPHIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2021 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSHGX vs. RPHIX — Risk / Return Rank
FSHGX
RPHIX
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI High Income Fund (FSHGX) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSHGX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.84 | 3.74 | -1.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 43.68 | -38.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.98 | 122.56 | -97.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSHGX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35 | 5.17 | -1.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 3.68 | -2.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 2.96 | -2.06 |
Drawdowns
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSHGX drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than RPHIX's maximum drawdown of -3.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHGX and RPHIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSHGX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.77% | -3.16% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.31% | -0.10% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.93% | -0.72% | -3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.77% | -0.92% | -14.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -3.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -0.09% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.47% | 0.04% | +0.43% |
Volatility
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity SAI High Income Fund (FSHGX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) at 0.24%. This indicates that FSHGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSHGX | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 0.24% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 0.59% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 0.88% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 1.26% | +4.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.24% | 1.20% | +4.04% |
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSHGX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RPHIX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSHGX vs. RPHIX - Dividend Comparison
FSHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.31%, more than RPHIX's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSHGX Fidelity SAI High Income Fund | 6.31% | 6.34% | 6.15% | 5.47% | 3.99% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 4.08% | 4.76% | 6.40% | 5.08% | 3.46% | 2.03% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 2.83% | 2.68% | 2.63% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSHGX and RPHIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSHGX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to RPHIX (0.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHGX dropped -15.77% vs RPHIX's -3.16%.
RPHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.17 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSHGX and RPHIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer