FSHGX vs. PYLD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FSHGX (Fidelity SAI High Income Fund) and PYLD (PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both funds - FSHGX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while PYLD is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 3 years, FSHGX returned 10.22%/yr vs 8.13%/yr for PYLD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSHGX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PYLD.

Performance

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity SAI High Income Fund (FSHGX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSHGX achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 1.60% return.

FSHGX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 3.91%
• 1Y: 9.25%
• 3Y*: 10.22%
• 5Y*: 4.42%
• 10Y*: —

PYLD

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.48%
• 1Y: 6.75%
• 3Y*: 8.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FSHGX Fidelity SAI High Income Fund	3.27%	10.26%	9.79%	6.50%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.60%	9.57%	7.69%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FSHGX and PYLD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.55

The correlation between FSHGX and PYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSHGX vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSHGX

FSHGX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FSHGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FSHGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FSHGX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FSHGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
FSHGX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PYLD

PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity SAI High Income Fund (FSHGX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSHGX	PYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	2.21	+0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.71	3.22	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.43	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.18	2.09	+2.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.06	9.45	+10.61

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSHGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSHGX and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSHGX drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSHGX and PYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSHGX	PYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.77%	-4.52%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.31%	-3.25%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.93%	-4.52%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.52%	-0.11%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.79%	-0.64%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.72%	-0.24%

Volatility

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity SAI High Income Fund (FSHGX) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) have volatilities of 1.03% and 1.07%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSHGX	PYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	1.07%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.71%	2.62%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	3.08%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.27%	3.99%	+1.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.22%	3.99%	+1.23%

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSHGX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSHGX vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

FSHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.34%, more than PYLD's 6.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FSHGX Fidelity SAI High Income Fund	6.34%	6.34%	6.15%	5.47%	3.99%	2.28%
PYLD PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund	6.25%	6.21%	6.40%	2.72%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSHGX and PYLD in my portfolio?

FSHGX and PYLD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSHGX or PYLD?

PYLD has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to FSHGX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSHGX dropped -15.77% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSHGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.