FSGS vs. TDIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSGS (First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FSGS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SMID Growth Strength Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSGS returned 2.19%/yr vs 19.29%/yr for TDIV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSGS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.

Performance

FSGS vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGS achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 30.57% return.

FSGS

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 0.20%
• 1Y: 4.81%
• 3Y*: 7.06%
• 5Y*: 2.19%
• 10Y*: —

TDIV

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 15.82%
• YTD: 30.57%
• 6M: 28.79%
• 1Y: 53.63%
• 3Y*: 33.27%
• 5Y*: 19.29%
• 10Y*: 19.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGS vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF	1.27%	2.41%	6.38%	15.98%	-13.17%	25.56%	10.26%	21.31%	-11.92%	10.39%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	30.57%	25.27%	24.43%	36.71%	-22.13%	29.49%	17.55%	33.27%	-3.18%	12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGS and TDIV is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.61

The correlation between FSGS and TDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FSGS vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FSGS	TDIV
Industrials	22.0%	1.6%
Financial Services	19.5%	-
Technology	18.8%	85.0%
Healthcare	16.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Energy	4.2%	-
Communication Services	3.1%	13.4%
Basic Materials	1.7%	-
Real Estate	0.9%	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FSGS vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGS

FSGS Risk / Return Rank: 14
FSGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FSGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FSGS Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FSGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FSGS Martin Ratio Rank: 15

TDIV

TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 83
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGS vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSGS	TDIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	2.93	-2.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.57	3.85	-3.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.49	-0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.43	5.02	-4.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.21	15.64	-14.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSGS vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGS and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSGS	TDIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32	2.93	-2.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11	0.94	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.88	-0.58

Drawdowns

FSGS vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGS drawdown since its inception was -43.26%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGS and TDIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSGS	TDIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.26%	-31.97%	-11.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.31%	-10.74%	-0.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.08%	-23.00%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.08%	-31.97%	+7.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.73%	-1.79%	-2.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.03%	-4.84%	-3.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	3.44%	+0.53%

Volatility

FSGS vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF (FSGS) is 3.74%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FSGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSGS	TDIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	6.86%	-3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	13.91%	-3.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	18.47%	-3.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	20.67%	-0.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.81%	20.85%	+1.96%

FSGS vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSGS vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

FSGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSGS First Trust SMID Growth Strength ETF	0.00%	0.00%	2.71%	2.29%	1.95%	1.35%	1.32%	1.77%	2.13%	1.15%	0.00%	0.00%
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund	1.12%	1.40%	1.59%	1.74%	2.51%	1.76%	2.07%	2.27%	2.97%	2.27%	2.45%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSGS and TDIV in my portfolio?

FSGS and TDIV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSGS or TDIV?

TDIV has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FSGS (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGS dropped -43.26% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

Which ETF is better, FSGS or TDIV?

On 5-year performance, TDIV leads with 19.29% vs 2.19% for FSGS. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FSGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FSGS or TDIV?

Over the 5-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 19.29% return vs 2.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FSGS or TDIV?

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FSGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FSGS or TDIV?

TDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.00% for FSGS.

What is the main difference between FSGS and TDIV?

FSGS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. FSGS tracks SMID Growth Strength Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FSGS and 0.50% for TDIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.