PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSGGX vs. SWRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly lower than SWRLX's 22.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX has underperformed SWRLX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while SWRLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.


FSGGX

1D
0.75%
1M
6.14%
YTD
15.86%
6M
18.71%
1Y
33.87%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
9.49%

SWRLX

1D
0.66%
1M
7.62%
YTD
22.19%
6M
26.89%
1Y
51.26%
3Y*
24.96%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
15.86%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-13.93%24.73%
SWRLX
Touchstone International Equity Fund
22.19%53.78%-1.53%17.63%-11.02%3.86%7.47%25.87%-16.81%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and SWRLX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.91

The correlation between FSGGX and SWRLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. SWRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

SWRLX
SWRLX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SWRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SWRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSGGXSWRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.66

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

4.42

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

16.56

-4.91

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is lower than the SWRLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and SWRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSGGXSWRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

3.57

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.72

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.64

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.41

+0.08

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum SWRLX drawdown of -59.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and SWRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSGGXSWRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-59.44%

+24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-11.49%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-14.08%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-34.19%

+4.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

-35.95%

+1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-11.63%

+4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.06%

-0.19%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Touchstone International Equity Fund (SWRLX) at 4.71%. This indicates that FSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSGGXSWRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

4.71%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

11.75%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

14.25%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.38%

-2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

16.85%

-0.66%

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SWRLX's 1.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSGGX vs. SWRLX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than SWRLX's 6.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.33%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%
SWRLX
Touchstone International Equity Fund
6.25%7.63%10.53%1.36%1.56%14.95%0.46%9.10%15.19%3.61%0.66%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FSGGX and SWRLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSGGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to SWRLX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs SWRLX's -59.44%.

SWRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSGGX and SWRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer