PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSGGX vs. FSSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly lower than FSSNX's 18.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX has underperformed FSSNX with an annualized return of 9.60%, while FSSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


FSGGX

1D
3.42%
1M
2.92%
YTD
13.45%
6M
15.37%
1Y
29.76%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.60%

FSSNX

1D
3.04%
1M
4.69%
YTD
18.33%
6M
15.24%
1Y
40.92%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
6.13%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
13.45%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-13.93%24.73%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
18.33%12.94%11.71%17.11%-20.28%14.70%19.99%25.70%-11.24%14.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and FSSNX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.71

The correlation between FSGGX and FSSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. FSSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

FSSNX
FSSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FSSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FSSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSGGXFSSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.32

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.46

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

12.23

-2.34

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the FSSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and FSSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum FSSNX drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FSSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSGGXFSSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-41.72%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-11.00%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-27.45%

+14.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.53%

-31.87%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

-41.72%

+6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.46%

-1.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-8.28%

+0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.11%

-0.18%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund (FSSNX) have volatilities of 6.77% and 7.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSGGXFSSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

7.09%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

14.37%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

19.71%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

22.68%

-7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

23.49%

-7.24%

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FSSNX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSGGX vs. FSSNX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than FSSNX's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.38%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%
FSSNX
Fidelity Small Cap Index Fund
0.92%1.08%1.04%1.43%1.26%3.92%0.94%2.96%4.94%3.37%2.27%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSGGX and FSSNX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSSNX has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to FSGGX (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs FSSNX's -41.72%.

FSSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSGGX and FSSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer