PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSGGX vs. FNILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly higher than FNILX's 11.56% return.


FSGGX

1D
0.75%
1M
6.14%
YTD
15.86%
6M
18.71%
1Y
33.87%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
9.49%

FNILX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.04%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.44%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
14.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
15.86%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-11.31%
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
11.56%17.81%25.47%27.45%-19.37%26.67%21.13%31.79%-13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and FNILX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FSGGX and FNILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. FNILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FNILX
FNILX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FNILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FNILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSGGXFNILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.45

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

3.28

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

15.01

-3.36

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FNILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and FNILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSGGXFNILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.82

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.76

-0.27

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, roughly equal to the maximum FNILX drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FNILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSGGXFNILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-33.76%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-9.01%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-19.08%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-25.40%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-5.37%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.97%

+0.90%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund (FNILX) at 2.88%. This indicates that FSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSGGXFNILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

2.88%

+2.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

8.99%

+3.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

11.93%

+2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.25%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

20.04%

-3.85%

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FNILX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSGGX vs. FNILX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than FNILX's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNILX
Fidelity ZERO Large Cap Index Fund
0.91%1.01%1.09%1.34%1.53%0.95%1.20%1.17%0.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.33%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSGGX and FNILX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSGGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to FNILX (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs FNILX's -33.76%.

FNILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSGGX and FNILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer