PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSGGX vs. FDIKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Diversified International Fund Class K (FDIKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly higher than FDIKX's 11.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSGGX having a 9.49% annualized return and FDIKX not far behind at 9.40%.


FSGGX

1D
0.75%
1M
6.14%
YTD
15.86%
6M
18.71%
1Y
33.87%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
9.49%

FDIKX

1D
0.72%
1M
5.51%
YTD
11.75%
6M
14.50%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*
9.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
15.86%32.93%5.30%15.57%-15.75%7.74%10.73%21.36%-13.93%24.73%
FDIKX
Fidelity Diversified International Fund Class K
11.75%27.87%6.62%17.84%-23.77%12.92%19.08%29.82%-15.19%25.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and FDIKX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2011

0.95

The correlation between FSGGX and FDIKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. FDIKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIKX
FDIKX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FDIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and Fidelity Diversified International Fund Class K (FDIKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSGGXFDIKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

1.84

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.65

7.21

+4.45

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the FDIKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and FDIKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSGGXFDIKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.36

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.46

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.56

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.26

+0.24

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum FDIKX drawdown of -57.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and FDIKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSGGXFDIKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.76%

-57.95%

+23.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-12.37%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-14.62%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

-35.52%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

-35.52%

+0.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-13.58%

+6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.16%

-0.29%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) is 4.97%, while Fidelity Diversified International Fund Class K (FDIKX) has a volatility of 6.08%. This indicates that FSGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSGGXFDIKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

6.08%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.27%

14.22%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

16.88%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.13%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

16.99%

-0.80%

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FDIKX's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSGGX vs. FDIKX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than FDIKX's 9.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIKX
Fidelity Diversified International Fund Class K
9.64%10.77%4.00%4.40%1.48%10.71%1.07%1.42%7.48%4.23%1.50%0.47%
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.33%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FSGGX and FDIKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDIKX has higher volatility (6.08%) compared to FSGGX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs FDIKX's -57.95%.

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSGGX and FDIKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer