FSGGX vs. AEPFX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FSGGX (Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund) and AEPFX (American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. FSGGX is passively managed, while AEPFX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FSGGX returned 9.11%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for AEPFX. Their correlation of 0.95 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FSGGX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for AEPFX.

Performance

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSGGX achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than AEPFX's 10.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSGGX having a 9.11% annualized return and AEPFX not far behind at 8.70%.

FSGGX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: 7.28%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 1Y: 29.14%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 9.21%
• 10Y*: 9.11%
• ALL TIME*: 7.68%

AEPFX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -0.13%
• 6M: 4.23%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 1Y: 25.34%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 5.13%
• 10Y*: 8.70%
• ALL TIME*: 5.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund	13.72%	32.93%	5.30%	15.57%	-15.75%	7.74%	10.73%	21.36%	-13.93%	24.73%
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2	10.24%	29.19%	2.89%	15.98%	-22.86%	2.74%	25.12%	27.28%	-17.41%	31.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FSGGX and AEPFX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011	0.95

The correlation between FSGGX and AEPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSGGX vs. AEPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSGGX

FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

AEPFX

AEPFX Risk / Return Rank: 46
AEPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
AEPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
AEPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
AEPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
AEPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) and American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSGGX	AEPFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.41	+0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.02	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.26	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	1.95	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.48	6.91	+2.57

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the AEPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSGGX and AEPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSGGX drawdown since its inception was -34.76%, smaller than the maximum AEPFX drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSGGX and AEPFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSGGX	AEPFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.76%	-48.79%	+14.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.26%	-12.54%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.31%	-15.64%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.53%	-37.37%	+7.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.76%	-37.37%	+2.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.30%	-2.89%	+0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.29%	-10.94%	+3.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	3.54%	-0.51%

Volatility

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) is 5.21%, while American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2 (AEPFX) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that FSGGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSGGX	AEPFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.21%	5.67%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.57%	15.25%	-0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.40%	17.35%	-0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.70%	17.00%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.10%	16.88%	-0.78%

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSGGX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AEPFX's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSGGX vs. AEPFX - Dividend Comparison

FSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, less than AEPFX's 16.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AEPFX American Funds EUPAC Fund Class F-2	16.65%	13.92%	4.86%	3.86%	1.93%	10.10%	0.34%	3.04%	3.06%	4.89%	1.54%	3.35%
FSGGX Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund	2.38%	2.70%	2.91%	2.95%	2.64%	2.60%	1.71%	2.85%	2.66%	0.22%	0.05%	2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSGGX and AEPFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FSGGX and AEPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSGGX or AEPFX?

AEPFX has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to FSGGX (5.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSGGX dropped -34.76% vs AEPFX's -48.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.