PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEP vs. QDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSEP vs. QDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSEP vs. QDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FSEP
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September
-2.39%12.83%13.56%20.23%-7.05%11.61%1.08%
QDEC
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December
-3.29%18.12%16.40%29.29%-22.26%17.23%1.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEP achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly higher than QDEC's -3.29% return.


FSEP

1D
2.14%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-0.42%
1Y
12.97%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
8.58%
10Y*

QDEC

1D
2.74%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
-3.29%
6M
1.11%
1Y
20.31%
3Y*
14.90%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSEP vs. QDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QDEC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FSEP vs. QDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEP
FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QDEC
QDEC Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEP vs. QDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEPQDECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.08

1.34

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

2.07

-0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.12

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.32

10.19

-1.87

FSEP vs. QDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the QDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEP and QDEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEPQDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.34

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.59

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.62

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between FSEP and QDEC is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSEP vs. QDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither FSEP nor QDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FSEP vs. QDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEP drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum QDEC drawdown of -25.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEP and QDEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEPQDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-25.25%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-9.45%

+1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

-25.25%

+11.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.60%

-5.04%

+1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-5.18%

+2.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.97%

-0.37%

Volatility

FSEP vs. QDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) is 3.75%, while FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – December (QDEC) has a volatility of 4.92%. This indicates that FSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSEPQDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

4.92%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.13%

8.04%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.12%

15.27%

-3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.75%

14.77%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.64%

14.77%

-4.13%