PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEP vs. LTTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEP vs. LTTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEP achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly higher than LTTI's -3.71% return.


FSEP

1D
0.63%
1M
1.42%
6M
7.02%
YTD
8.36%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
10.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.55%

LTTI

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.12%
6M
-3.46%
YTD
-3.71%
1Y
-2.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$980.77K$991.65K$2.90M
$122.14K$118.29K$122.26K

FSEP vs. LTTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FSEP and LTTI is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEP vs. LTTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSEP
FSEP Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTI
LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSEP vs. LTTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSEPLTTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

0.96

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

-0.29

+3.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.70

-0.64

+14.34

FSEP vs. LTTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the LTTI Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEP and LTTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSEP vs. LTTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEP drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, which is greater than LTTI's maximum drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEP and LTTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEPLTTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.79%

-9.02%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.62%

-7.63%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.25%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-3.79%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

3.47%

-2.34%

Volatility

FSEP vs. LTTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) is 1.97%, while FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that FSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSEPLTTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.97%

2.31%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

6.28%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.69%

8.37%

-0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.87%

10.05%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.46%

10.05%

+0.41%

FSEP vs. LTTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSEP vs. LTTI - Dividend Comparison

FSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.54%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FSEP and LTTI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTTI has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to FSEP (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEP dropped -13.79% vs LTTI's -9.02%.

On 1-year performance, FSEP leads with 15.51% vs -2.22% for LTTI. On fees, LTTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSEP has performed better with a 15.51% return vs -2.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LTTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FSEP.

LTTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.54%, compared with 0.00% for FSEP.

FSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while LTTI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FSEP and 0.65% for LTTI.

FSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEP and LTTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer