FSEP vs. BITI
FSEP (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSEP is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FSEP returned 13.53%/yr vs -32.35%/yr for BITI. Their -0.36 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FSEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.
Performance
FSEP vs. BITI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEP achieves a 8.36% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 25.22% return.
FSEP
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 7.02%
- YTD
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.55%
BITI
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -4.03%
- 6M
- 13.09%
- YTD
- 25.22%
- 1Y
- 56.28%
- 3Y*
- -32.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.18M | $25.87M | $38.72M | |
| $980.77K | $991.65K | $2.90M |
FSEP vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 8.36% | 12.83% | 13.56% | 20.23% | 7.10% |
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 25.22% | -1.76% | -62.60% | -66.17% | 3.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEP and BITI is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022 | -0.36 |
The correlation between FSEP and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.47 (1 year) to -0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSEP vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank
FSEP
BITI
FSEP vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSEP | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.22 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.24 | +0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.70 | 5.45 | +8.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSEP vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEP drawdown since its inception was -13.79%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEP and BITI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEP | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.79% | -92.16% | +78.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.62% | -25.28% | +19.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.37% | -84.63% | +72.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -86.33% | +86.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.09% | -68.61% | +66.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 10.37% | -9.24% |
Volatility
FSEP vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (FSEP) is 1.97%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that FSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSEP | BITI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.97% | 8.93% | -6.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 33.35% | -27.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.69% | 44.25% | -36.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.87% | 52.01% | -41.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.46% | 52.01% | -41.55% |
FSEP vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSEP vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison
FSEP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF | 21.80% | 1.60% | 3.91% | 3.33% | 0.06% |
FSEP FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSEP and BITI have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITI has higher volatility (8.93%) compared to FSEP (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSEP dropped -13.79% vs BITI's -92.16%.
On 3-year performance, FSEP leads with 13.53% vs -32.35% for BITI. On fees, FSEP is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FSEP has performed better with a 13.53% return vs -32.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSEP is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.
BITI has the higher dividend yield at 21.80%, compared with 0.00% for FSEP.
FSEP is categorized as Options Trading, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. FSEP tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index September, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FSEP and 1.03% for BITI.
FSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSEP and BITI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer