FSENX vs. FBCGX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) and FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) are both mutual funds - FSENX is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBCGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSENX returned 21.65%/yr vs 15.48%/yr for FBCGX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSENX charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FBCGX.

Performance

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSENX achieves a 32.92% return, which is significantly higher than FBCGX's 13.16% return.

FSENX

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 32.92%
• 6M: 31.47%
• 1Y: 41.02%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 21.65%
• 10Y*: 9.51%

FBCGX

• 1D: 2.77%
• 1M: -0.87%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 6M: 14.57%
• 1Y: 37.63%
• 3Y*: 29.77%
• 5Y*: 15.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	32.92%	10.56%	4.26%	0.94%	62.98%	55.31%	-32.51%	9.90%	-24.94%	9.89%
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	13.16%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	36.11%	-2.33%	14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between FSENX and FBCGX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017	0.33

The correlation between FSENX and FBCGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSENX vs. FBCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSENX

FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 70
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSENX	FBCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.95	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.55	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.34	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.48	2.86	+1.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	11.69	+1.05

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FBCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSENX and FBCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSENX drawdown since its inception was -76.24%, which is greater than FBCGX's maximum drawdown of -42.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSENX and FBCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSENX	FBCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.24%	-42.55%	-33.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.95%	-12.64%	+2.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.85%	-26.83%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-42.55%	+14.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.57%	-3.77%	-2.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.00%	-8.87%	-8.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	3.08%	+0.41%

Volatility

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) is 6.56%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that FSENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSENX	FBCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.56%	7.13%	-0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.63%	14.37%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	18.57%	+1.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.31%	25.09%	+2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.93%	24.90%	+6.03%

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSENX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCGX's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSENX vs. FBCGX - Dividend Comparison

FSENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than FBCGX's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	0.85%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	1.61%	1.95%	1.95%	1.98%	2.50%	2.25%	3.43%	1.84%	1.48%	1.74%	0.62%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSENX and FBCGX in my portfolio?

FSENX and FBCGX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSENX or FBCGX?

FBCGX has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to FSENX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSENX dropped -76.24% vs FBCGX's -42.55%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.