PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEM.L achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than JPEA.L's 1.57% return.


FSEM.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.55%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.31%
1Y
12.88%
3Y*
8.73%
5Y*
1.51%
10Y*

JPEA.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.57%
6M
1.92%
1Y
11.69%
3Y*
9.77%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSEM.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc
2.80%13.32%3.51%8.82%-17.90%2.49%
JPEA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
1.57%13.77%5.72%10.89%-18.56%3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FSEM.L and JPEA.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.73

The correlation between FSEM.L and JPEA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEM.L
FSEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FSEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

JPEA.L
JPEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JPEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSEM.LJPEA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.63

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.58

11.24

+0.34

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the JPEA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEM.L and JPEA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSEM.LJPEA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.07

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.22

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.29

-0.06

Drawdowns

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEM.L drawdown since its inception was -28.00%, roughly equal to the maximum JPEA.L drawdown of -28.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEM.L and JPEA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSEM.LJPEA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.00%

-28.64%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.02%

-4.42%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-7.35%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.00%

-28.64%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-0.32%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-6.81%

-3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.11%

1.04%

+0.07%

Volatility

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc (FSEM.L) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (JPEA.L) at 1.92%. This indicates that FSEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSEM.LJPEA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

1.92%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.22%

4.55%

+0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39%

5.64%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.58%

8.89%

-0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.48%

10.22%

-1.74%

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSEM.L and JPEA.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

FSEM.L vs. JPEA.L - Dividend Comparison

FSEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, while JPEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FSEM.L
Fidelity Sustainable USD EM Bond UCITS ETF Inc
7.91%6.31%6.49%5.74%5.01%2.41%
JPEA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSEM.L and JPEA.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSEM.L and JPEA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSEM.L and JPEA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer