FSELX vs. MU
FSELX (Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio) is Semiconductors fund managed by Fidelity, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, FSELX returned 38.57%/yr vs 55.83%/yr for MU. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FSELX vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSELX achieves a 74.64% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FSELX has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 38.57%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.83% annualized return.
FSELX
- 1D
- 6.51%
- 1M
- 5.34%
- YTD
- 74.64%
- 6M
- 78.43%
- 1Y
- 145.49%
- 3Y*
- 63.72%
- 5Y*
- 44.40%
- 10Y*
- 38.57%
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 26.49%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 751.18%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
FSELX vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 74.64% | 52.17% | 49.68% | 78.49% | -35.27% | 59.16% | 44.33% | 64.50% | -12.01% | 34.51% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSELX and MU is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1989 | 0.67 |
The correlation between FSELX and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSELX vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
FSELX
MU
FSELX vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSELX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -6.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.78 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.83 | 24.91 | -15.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.64 | 94.64 | -59.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSELX vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSELX drawdown since its inception was -82.54%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSELX and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSELX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.54% | -98.25% | +15.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -30.28% | +15.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.31% | -57.63% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.37% | -57.63% | +11.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.37% | -57.63% | +11.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -9.07% | +2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.68% | -58.16% | +29.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 7.95% | -3.99% |
Volatility
FSELX vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio (FSELX) is 17.37%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that FSELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSELX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.37% | 32.86% | -15.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.71% | 57.74% | -29.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.11% | 69.66% | -34.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.38% | 53.18% | -13.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.29% | 50.12% | -14.83% |
Dividends
FSELX vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
FSELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSELX Fidelity Select Semiconductors Portfolio | 9.38% | 11.11% | 7.97% | 7.20% | 6.69% | 6.99% | 8.13% | 3.36% | 26.80% | 14.44% | 3.82% | 15.22% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSELX and MU have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to FSELX (17.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSELX dropped -82.54% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 4.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSELX and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer