FSEDX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (FSEDX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FSEDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jan 24, 2021. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEDX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund | -2.63% | 19.49% | -2.54% | 13.58% | -7.94% | -9.28% | 3.54% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 5.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSEDX achieves a -2.63% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's -1.94% return.
FSEDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -2.63%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSEDX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FSEDX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FSEDX
FSPSX
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (FSEDX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSEDX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.11 | +0.86 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.71 | 1.56 | +1.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 1.54 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 5.93 | +2.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSEDX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.11 | +0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.46 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSEDX and FSPSX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FSEDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSEDX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund | 7.76% | 6.97% | 6.92% | 5.14% | 0.00% | 3.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSEDX drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEDX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSEDX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -33.69% | +8.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | -11.39% | +5.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.00% | -29.41% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -10.86% | +4.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -6.59% | -1.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 2.96% | -1.62% |
Volatility
FSEDX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt Local Currency Fund (FSEDX) is 3.26%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FSEDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSEDX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.26% | 7.04% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.38% | 10.63% | -6.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.93% | 16.79% | -10.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 15.77% | -8.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.66% | 16.47% | -8.81% |