PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSEC vs. FIGB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FSEC vs. FIGB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FSEC vs. FIGB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
0.26%8.33%2.40%5.22%-12.62%-0.49%
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
0.03%6.95%1.51%6.65%-13.43%1.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSEC achieves a 0.26% return, which is significantly higher than FIGB's 0.03% return.


FSEC

1D
-0.11%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.26%
6M
1.94%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*

FIGB

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FSEC vs. FIGB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSEC and FIGB have an expense ratio of 0.36%.


Return for Risk

FSEC vs. FIGB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSEC
FSEC Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

FIGB
FIGB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FIGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIGB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FIGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIGB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSEC vs. FIGB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) and Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSECFIGBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.15

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.57

4.12

-0.55

FSEC vs. FIGB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the FIGB Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSEC and FIGB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSECFIGBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.07

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.06

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FSEC and FIGB is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FSEC vs. FIGB - Dividend Comparison

FSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FIGB's 4.12% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
FSEC
Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF
4.43%4.22%3.22%3.41%2.21%0.96%
FIGB
Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF
4.12%4.15%4.28%3.79%2.44%1.10%

Drawdowns

FSEC vs. FIGB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSEC drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, roughly equal to the maximum FIGB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSEC and FIGB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FSECFIGBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-18.08%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-3.46%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-18.08%

+0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-1.71%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.82%

-7.11%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

1.13%

+0.37%

Volatility

FSEC vs. FIGB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF (FSEC) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (FIGB) at 1.71%. This indicates that FSEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIGB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FSECFIGBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

1.71%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.38%

2.70%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

5.16%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.72%

6.25%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.68%

6.22%

+0.46%