FSDPX vs. PGJZX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FSDPX (Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio) and PGJZX (PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund) are both mutual funds - FSDPX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while PGJZX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, FSDPX returned 7.91%/yr vs 8.77%/yr for PGJZX. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FSDPX charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for PGJZX.

Performance

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSDPX achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than PGJZX's 8.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FSDPX has underperformed PGJZX with an annualized return of 7.91%, while PGJZX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.77% annualized return.

FSDPX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -2.25%
• 6M: 2.49%
• YTD: 11.29%
• 1Y: 18.91%
• 3Y*: 4.74%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 7.91%
• ALL TIME*: 9.14%

PGJZX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -2.05%
• 6M: 3.95%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 1Y: 13.01%
• 3Y*: 15.19%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 8.77%
• ALL TIME*: 8.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio	11.29%	11.32%	-2.95%	7.29%	-9.86%	31.66%	21.78%	12.40%	-23.74%	25.99%
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund	8.24%	18.41%	17.13%	5.85%	-7.82%	15.06%	1.98%	28.89%	-8.57%	18.81%

Correlation

The correlation between FSDPX and PGJZX is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.65

The correlation between FSDPX and PGJZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSDPX vs. PGJZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FSDPX

FSDPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
FSDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FSDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FSDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FSDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
FSDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

PGJZX

PGJZX Risk / Return Rank: 40
PGJZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PGJZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PGJZX Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PGJZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
PGJZX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) and PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSDPX	PGJZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.20	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.31	1.68	-0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.22	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	1.90	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.74	5.49	-1.75

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSDPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the PGJZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSDPX and PGJZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSDPX drawdown since its inception was -64.19%, which is greater than PGJZX's maximum drawdown of -36.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDPX and PGJZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSDPX	PGJZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.19%	-36.64%	-27.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.16%	-7.01%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.13%	-9.51%	-12.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.39%	-20.56%	-4.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.89%	-36.64%	-13.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.18%	-4.69%	-1.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.27%	-5.58%	-5.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	2.42%	+1.97%

Volatility

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio (FSDPX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund (PGJZX) at 3.51%. This indicates that FSDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGJZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSDPX	PGJZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	3.51%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.06%	9.53%	+5.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.65%	11.15%	+7.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.39%	14.36%	+6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.69%	15.73%	+5.96%

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSDPX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PGJZX's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSDPX vs. PGJZX - Dividend Comparison

FSDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, less than PGJZX's 6.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSDPX Fidelity Select Materials Portfolio	5.05%	1.94%	12.46%	5.46%	3.34%	0.71%	0.68%	1.22%	12.89%	5.08%	1.05%	2.42%
PGJZX PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure Fund	6.51%	7.18%	9.95%	1.59%	3.30%	7.77%	1.17%	1.58%	2.13%	1.35%	1.71%	1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSDPX and PGJZX in my portfolio?

FSDPX and PGJZX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSDPX or PGJZX?

FSDPX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to PGJZX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSDPX dropped -64.19% vs PGJZX's -36.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PGJZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.