PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSDIX vs. FTSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income Fund (FSDIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class M (FTSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FSDIX having a 12.51% return and FTSDX slightly lower at 12.20%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSDIX having a 9.18% annualized return and FTSDX not far ahead at 9.25%.


FSDIX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.65%
YTD
12.51%
6M
6.46%
1Y
16.35%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.18%

FTSDX

1D
-0.36%
1M
1.62%
YTD
12.20%
6M
12.61%
1Y
22.74%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
7.81%
10Y*
9.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSDIX
Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income Fund
12.51%6.52%11.52%9.45%-9.84%19.03%11.23%22.50%-4.33%11.23%
FTSDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class M
12.20%12.43%10.90%8.95%-10.41%18.43%10.66%21.87%-4.88%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between FSDIX and FTSDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003

1.00

The correlation between FSDIX and FTSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSDIX vs. FTSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSDIX
FSDIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FSDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FSDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

FTSDX
FTSDX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FTSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FTSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income Fund (FSDIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class M (FTSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSDIXFTSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

3.91

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

16.42

-7.92

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSDIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the FTSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSDIX and FTSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSDIXFTSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.75

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.72

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.75

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Drawdowns

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSDIX drawdown since its inception was -58.92%, roughly equal to the maximum FTSDX drawdown of -59.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSDIX and FTSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSDIXFTSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.92%

-59.20%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.38%

-5.82%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.49%

-12.69%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.08%

-17.45%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.99%

-30.03%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.36%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-6.65%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.38%

+0.54%

Volatility

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income Fund (FSDIX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class M (FTSDX) have volatilities of 2.36% and 2.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSDIXFTSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

2.29%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.82%

6.29%

+2.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.21%

8.27%

+1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.28%

10.96%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.58%

12.41%

+0.17%

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSDIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSDX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSDIX vs. FTSDX - Dividend Comparison

FSDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than FTSDX's 6.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSDIX
Fidelity Strategic Dividend & Income Fund
1.62%1.80%5.27%5.71%4.23%8.43%5.67%6.68%8.19%6.57%4.92%6.38%
FTSDX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class M
6.69%7.48%4.78%5.23%3.71%7.97%5.22%6.21%7.64%6.22%4.44%5.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FSDIX and FTSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FSDIX has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to FTSDX (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSDIX dropped -58.92% vs FTSDX's -59.20%.

FTSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSDIX and FTSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer