FSCZX vs. AVERX
FSCZX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class Z) and AVERX (Ave Maria Value Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, FSCZX returned 21.50% vs 19.33% for AVERX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSCZX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for AVERX.
Performance
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCZX achieves a 8.46% return, which is significantly lower than AVERX's 19.40% return.
FSCZX
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 21.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- —
AVERX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 19.40%
- 6M
- 16.42%
- 1Y
- 19.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSCZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class Z | 8.46% | 18.74% |
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 19.40% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCZX and AVERX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.52 |
The correlation between FSCZX and AVERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCZX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCZX
AVERX
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class Z (FSCZX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCZX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.19 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 1.94 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.01 | 4.55 | +8.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCZX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.05 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.95 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCZX drawdown since its inception was -39.70%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -11.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCZX and AVERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCZX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.70% | -11.33% | -28.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -10.27% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.11% | +7.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -5.74% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 4.36% | -2.63% |
Volatility
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class Z (FSCZX) is 2.62%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that FSCZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCZX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 4.59% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 14.73% | -6.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.55% | 19.03% | -8.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 18.85% | -3.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 18.85% | -0.75% |
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCZX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSCZX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison
FSCZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, more than AVERX's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSCZX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund Class Z | 8.30% | 7.17% | 10.56% | 2.62% | 8.42% | 4.49% | 2.32% | 1.83% | 7.75% | 1.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCZX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVERX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to FSCZX (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCZX dropped -39.70% vs AVERX's -11.33%.
FSCZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCZX and AVERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer