FSCSX vs. FCBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX).
FSCSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985. FCBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 4, 2010.
Performance
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCSX Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio | -27.86% | 6.96% | 19.66% | 51.72% | -29.13% | 18.13% | 45.55% | 38.99% | 4.08% | 38.60% |
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | -1.20% | 7.86% | 2.82% | 8.82% | -17.11% | -1.59% | 10.59% | 14.48% | -2.56% | 6.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCSX achieves a -27.86% return, which is significantly lower than FCBFX's -1.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCSX has outperformed FCBFX with an annualized return of 14.26%, while FCBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.84% annualized return.
FSCSX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -27.86%
- 6M
- -29.20%
- 1Y
- -12.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
FCBFX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.82%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FCBFX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCSX vs. FCBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCSX
FCBFX
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) and Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCSX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | 0.98 | -1.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | 1.37 | -1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.17 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.55 | -2.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 5.00 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCSX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | 0.98 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.07 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.48 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.70 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCSX and FCBFX is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Dividend Comparison
FSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.35%, more than FCBFX's 3.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCSX Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio | 21.35% | 15.40% | 19.17% | 7.72% | 9.06% | 6.54% | 5.10% | 12.70% | 6.20% | 7.15% | 3.98% | 5.22% |
FCBFX Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund | 3.85% | 4.11% | 3.95% | 3.74% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.19% | 3.28% | 3.65% | 3.16% | 3.55% | 3.01% |
Drawdowns
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCSX drawdown since its inception was -64.66%, which is greater than FCBFX's maximum drawdown of -23.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCSX and FCBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCSX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.66% | -23.23% | -41.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.62% | -3.31% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.06% | -23.21% | -13.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.06% | -23.23% | -13.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.99% | -2.76% | -29.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -4.00% | -9.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 1.03% | +10.67% |
Volatility
FSCSX vs. FCBFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Fidelity Corporate Bond Fund (FCBFX) at 1.85%. This indicates that FSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCSX | FCBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 1.85% | +6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.01% | 2.86% | +17.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 4.78% | +23.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 6.68% | +18.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 5.94% | +18.12% |