FSCSX vs. VONG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG).
FSCSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 29, 1985. VONG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010.
Performance
FSCSX vs. VONG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCSX vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCSX Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio | -27.86% | 6.96% | 19.66% | 51.72% | -29.13% | 18.13% | 45.55% | 38.99% | 4.08% | 38.60% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.79% | 18.45% | 33.20% | 42.67% | -29.18% | 27.60% | 38.30% | 36.06% | -1.53% | 30.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCSX achieves a -27.86% return, which is significantly lower than VONG's -9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCSX has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 14.26%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.65% annualized return.
FSCSX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -27.86%
- 6M
- -29.20%
- 1Y
- -12.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
VONG
- 1D
- 3.76%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- -9.79%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 18.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCSX vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCSX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCSX vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank
FSCSX
VONG
FSCSX vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCSX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | 0.84 | -1.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | 1.36 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.19 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 1.16 | -1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 4.00 | -5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCSX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.46 | 0.84 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.58 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.80 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.84 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCSX and VONG is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSCSX vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison
FSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.35%, more than VONG's 0.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCSX Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio | 21.35% | 15.40% | 19.17% | 7.72% | 9.06% | 6.54% | 5.10% | 12.70% | 6.20% | 7.15% | 3.98% | 5.22% |
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.51% | 0.45% | 0.55% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 0.58% | 0.77% | 1.03% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
FSCSX vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCSX drawdown since its inception was -64.66%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCSX and VONG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCSX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.66% | -32.72% | -31.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.62% | -16.23% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.06% | -32.72% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.06% | -32.72% | -4.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.99% | -13.09% | -18.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -4.90% | -8.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 4.72% | +6.98% |
Volatility
FSCSX vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Software & IT Services Portfolio (FSCSX) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 6.72%. This indicates that FSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCSX | VONG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 6.72% | +1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.01% | 12.34% | +7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 22.40% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.48% | 21.35% | +4.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.06% | 20.82% | +3.24% |