FSCS vs. OILK
FSCS (First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSCS is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the SMID Capital Strength Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FSCS returned 4.93%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSCS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
FSCS vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCS achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
FSCS
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.54%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- -1.10%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FSCS vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCS First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF | -1.53% | 1.77% | 14.98% | 16.81% | -9.11% | 26.08% | 5.71% | 28.00% | -12.85% | 10.74% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 38.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCS and OILK is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.19 |
The correlation between FSCS and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FSCS vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSCS
OILK
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
FSCS
OILK
-
Industrials
FSCS
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FSCS
OILK
Consumer Defensive
FSCS
OILK
-
Real Estate
FSCS
OILK
-
Technology
FSCS
OILK
-
Healthcare
FSCS
OILK
-
Basic Materials
FSCS
OILK
-
Energy
FSCS
OILK
-
Communication Services
FSCS
OILK
-
Utilities
FSCS
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCS vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
FSCS
OILK
FSCS vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.34 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | 3.42 | -3.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.31 | 6.91 | -7.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.06 | -2.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.59 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.12 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
FSCS vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCS drawdown since its inception was -43.57%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCS and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.57% | -83.76% | +40.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -17.35% | +9.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -23.42% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.25% | -34.69% | +13.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -3.66% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -32.61% | +26.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 8.56% | -4.96% |
Volatility
FSCS vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) is 3.07%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FSCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCS | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 10.44% | -7.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 23.26% | -15.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 28.75% | -16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.09% | 30.12% | -12.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 35.97% | -14.77% |
FSCS vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSCS vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
FSCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCS First Trust SMID Capital Strength ETF | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.12% | 1.47% | 1.71% | 1.21% | 1.33% | 1.68% | 1.67% | 0.67% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSCS and OILK have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FSCS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCS dropped -43.57% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 4.93% for FSCS. On fees, FSCS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FSCS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSCS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.91% for FSCS.
FSCS is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. FSCS tracks SMID Capital Strength Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FSCS and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCS and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer