PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSCM.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCM.DE achieves a 3.10% return, which is significantly higher than IBCQ.DE's -0.59% return.


FSCM.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.26%
6M
2.21%
YTD
3.10%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-2.11%

IBCQ.DE

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.59%
6M
-0.83%
YTD
-0.59%
1Y
1.42%
3Y*
3.17%
5Y*
-1.50%
10Y*
0.30%
ALL TIME*
1.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FSCM.DE
Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD
3.10%-2.05%6.97%6.07%-10.63%-12.81%
IBCQ.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.59%4.51%1.64%6.18%-16.03%1.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2021

0.45

The correlation between FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCM.DE
FSCM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FSCM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCQ.DE
IBCQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBCQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSCM.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCM.DEIBCQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.43

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

1.33

+4.23

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the IBCQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCM.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.52%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCQ.DE drawdown of -21.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCM.DEIBCQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.52%

-21.76%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.57%

-3.27%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.72%

-4.75%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.32%

-21.65%

+9.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-8.08%

-2.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.01%

-5.41%

-10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.06%

-0.04%

Volatility

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD (FSCM.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.13% compared to iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE) at 0.88%. This indicates that FSCM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCM.DEIBCQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

0.88%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

4.65%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

5.45%

-0.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.87%

6.13%

+0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.57%

5.85%

+3.72%

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FSCM.DE vs. IBCQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

FSCM.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.94%, more than IBCQ.DE's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCM.DE
Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor UCITS ETF INC-USD
5.94%4.95%5.01%4.66%2.98%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBCQ.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.15%3.96%3.75%3.20%2.62%2.09%2.36%2.66%3.00%2.19%2.51%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

FSCM.DE tracks Fidelity Sustainable Global Corporate Bond Paris-Aligned Multifactor, while IBCQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCM.DE and IBCQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer