PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBCQ.DE achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than KLMT.DE's 1.25% return.


IBCQ.DE

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.56%
6M
0.23%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
-1.18%
10Y*
0.44%

KLMT.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.92%
6M
1.62%
YTD
1.25%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
-1.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBCQ.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.37%4.51%1.64%6.18%-16.03%-2.10%5.98%9.58%-4.23%2.79%
KLMT.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
1.25%-0.22%3.20%6.84%-18.17%-1.90%3.12%8.93%1.08%-2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2017

0.60

The correlation between IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBCQ.DE
IBCQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IBCQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KLMT.DE
KLMT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
KLMT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLMT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBCQ.DEKLMT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.08

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.51

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

1.36

+0.75

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBCQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is comparable to the KLMT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBCQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.76%, roughly equal to the maximum KLMT.DE drawdown of -21.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBCQ.DEKLMT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.76%

-21.02%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.27%

-3.19%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-3.58%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-20.35%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.19%

-11.35%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-8.15%

+2.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.20%

-0.18%

Volatility

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBCQ.DE) and Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc (KLMT.DE) have volatilities of 0.90% and 0.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBCQ.DEKLMT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

0.94%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.67%

3.20%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.42%

3.87%

+1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

5.80%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

5.95%

-0.10%

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IBCQ.DE vs. KLMT.DE - Dividend Comparison

IBCQ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, while KLMT.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBCQ.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.11%3.96%3.75%3.20%2.62%2.09%2.36%2.66%3.00%2.19%2.51%2.75%
KLMT.DE
Amundi Global Aggregate Green Bond UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

IBCQ.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (EUR Hedged), while KLMT.DE tracks Solactive Green Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBCQ.DE and KLMT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer