FSCIX vs. TISBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FSCIX (Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class I) and TISBX (TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FSCIX returned 11.46%/yr vs 11.09%/yr for TISBX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSCIX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TISBX.

Performance

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class I (FSCIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FSCIX having a 18.50% return and TISBX slightly higher at 18.69%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FSCIX having a 11.46% annualized return and TISBX not far behind at 11.09%.

FSCIX

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 18.50%
• 6M: 16.73%
• 1Y: 37.93%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: 9.16%
• 10Y*: 11.46%

TISBX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 41.07%
• 3Y*: 18.65%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSCIX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class I	18.50%	12.12%	11.59%	18.58%	-20.51%	31.58%	17.44%	32.70%	-16.25%	14.09%
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	18.69%	12.72%	11.60%	17.07%	-20.31%	14.85%	20.14%	25.61%	-10.99%	13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCIX and TISBX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.95

The correlation between FSCIX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FSCIX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCIX

FSCIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
FSCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FSCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
FSCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FSCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FSCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

TISBX

TISBX Risk / Return Rank: 64
TISBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TISBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TISBX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TISBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
TISBX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class I (FSCIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSCIX	TISBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.29	2.28	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	3.12	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.37	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	3.99	+0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.35	14.14	+2.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is comparable to the TISBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCIX and TISBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSCIX	TISBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.29	2.28	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.30	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	0.48	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.39	+0.12

Drawdowns

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCIX drawdown since its inception was -49.58%, smaller than the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCIX and TISBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSCIX	TISBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.58%	-56.50%	+6.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.33%	-10.95%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.18%	-27.44%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.32%	-31.89%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.41%	-41.69%	+1.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.96%	-0.13%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.95%	-9.69%	-1.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	3.08%	-0.61%

Volatility

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class I (FSCIX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) have volatilities of 5.57% and 5.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSCIX	TISBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	5.59%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.06%	13.58%	-0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.68%	19.16%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.50%	22.55%	-1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.67%	23.44%	-1.77%

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCIX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSCIX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison

FSCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than TISBX's 3.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSCIX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Fund Class I	1.37%	1.62%	12.26%	1.17%	4.64%	9.81%	2.39%	3.53%	13.10%	12.79%	2.44%	7.76%
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund	3.47%	4.12%	6.82%	3.09%	1.97%	8.96%	2.65%	5.16%	9.29%	4.49%	4.03%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSCIX and TISBX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FSCIX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FSCIX or TISBX?

TISBX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to FSCIX (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCIX dropped -49.58% vs TISBX's -56.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.