PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCHX vs. VAW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCHX vs. VAW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCHX achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly higher than VAW's 11.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCHX has underperformed VAW with an annualized return of 6.71%, while VAW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.46% annualized return.


FSCHX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.94%
YTD
20.42%
6M
20.30%
1Y
15.45%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
6.71%

VAW

1D
-1.83%
1M
0.83%
YTD
11.07%
6M
9.68%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCHX vs. VAW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCHX
Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio
20.42%-8.85%-6.17%12.80%-13.81%31.95%17.52%8.30%-22.30%31.63%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
11.07%12.30%0.48%13.67%-11.80%27.43%19.44%23.53%-17.49%23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCHX and VAW is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.94

The correlation between FSCHX and VAW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCHX vs. VAW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCHX
FSCHX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FSCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

VAW
VAW Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VAW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VAW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VAW Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VAW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VAW Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCHX vs. VAW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) and Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCHXVAWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

1.55

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

4.90

-1.92

FSCHX vs. VAW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the VAW Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCHX and VAW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCHX vs. VAW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCHX drawdown since its inception was -59.24%, roughly equal to the maximum VAW drawdown of -62.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCHX and VAW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCHXVAWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.24%

-62.17%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-13.42%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-23.21%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.38%

-25.50%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.75%

-41.13%

-10.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.28%

-5.58%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.88%

-9.62%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.73%

4.23%

+1.50%

Volatility

FSCHX vs. VAW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio (FSCHX) is 4.91%, while Vanguard Materials ETF (VAW) has a volatility of 6.78%. This indicates that FSCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VAW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCHXVAWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

6.78%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

14.86%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

18.50%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

19.72%

+0.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

21.23%

+1.27%

FSCHX vs. VAW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCHX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VAW's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCHX vs. VAW - Dividend Comparison

FSCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than VAW's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCHX
Fidelity Select Chemicals Portfolio
2.84%2.23%8.27%6.33%11.44%1.18%1.10%6.97%15.01%8.05%4.75%6.58%
VAW
Vanguard Materials ETF
1.39%1.55%1.70%1.72%1.98%1.44%1.67%1.94%2.03%1.63%1.67%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCHX and VAW have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VAW has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to FSCHX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCHX dropped -59.24% vs VAW's -62.17%.

VAW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCHX and VAW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer