PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSCCX vs. TIEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I (TIEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSCCX achieves a 15.78% return, which is significantly higher than TIEIX's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has underperformed TIEIX with an annualized return of 7.83%, while TIEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.85% annualized return.


FSCCX

1D
1.07%
1M
2.74%
YTD
15.78%
6M
13.32%
1Y
26.88%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
7.83%

TIEIX

1D
1.13%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.68%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
20.52%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
14.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSCCX
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
15.78%3.21%14.82%11.86%-12.42%35.38%-4.21%17.28%-20.65%6.35%
TIEIX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I
10.43%17.04%23.71%25.92%-19.18%25.64%20.82%30.89%-5.27%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FSCCX and TIEIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 1999

0.85

The correlation between FSCCX and TIEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSCCX vs. TIEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSCCX
FSCCX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FSCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
FSCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

TIEIX
TIEIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TIEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TIEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I (TIEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FSCCXTIEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

3.06

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.86

13.64

-5.78

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSCCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the TIEIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSCCX and TIEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than TIEIX's maximum drawdown of -55.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and TIEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSCCXTIEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.90%

-55.55%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.36%

-8.84%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-19.29%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.81%

-25.06%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.80%

-34.90%

-18.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.15%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-10.28%

-3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.97%

+1.45%

Volatility

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) is 4.35%, while Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I (TIEIX) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that FSCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSCCXTIEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.35%

4.84%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.07%

+1.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

12.78%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

17.41%

+3.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

18.44%

+4.98%

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TIEIX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSCCX vs. TIEIX - Dividend Comparison

FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than TIEIX's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSCCX
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund
0.95%1.09%1.52%1.02%1.24%0.52%0.54%1.16%4.21%1.03%2.63%1.80%
TIEIX
Nuveen Equity Index Fund Class I
2.17%2.39%1.63%1.47%1.83%2.08%1.43%1.99%2.45%0.52%2.45%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSCCX and TIEIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TIEIX has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to FSCCX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCCX dropped -65.90% vs TIEIX's -55.55%.

TIEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSCCX and TIEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer