FSCCX vs. QQQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX).
FSCCX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Aug 1, 1994. QQQX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.
Performance
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | -1.53% | 3.21% | 14.82% | 11.86% | -12.42% | 35.38% | -4.21% | 17.28% | -20.65% | 6.35% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | -4.39% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCCX achieves a -1.53% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 6.61%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.
FSCCX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- -2.03%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.61%
QQQX
- 1D
- 4.83%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCCX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCCX
QQQX
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCCX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 1.07 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.68 | 1.61 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.73 | -1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.28 | 8.57 | -7.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCCX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 1.07 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.37 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.55 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.45 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCCX and QQQX is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison
FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, less than QQQX's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | 1.11% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.02% | 1.24% | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.16% | 4.21% | 1.03% | 2.63% | 1.80% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.61% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
Drawdowns
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than QQQX's maximum drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and QQQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCCX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.90% | -57.25% | -8.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -12.93% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -29.33% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.80% | -35.96% | -17.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.31% | -4.72% | -4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -8.09% | -5.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 2.61% | +1.73% |
Volatility
FSCCX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) is 4.77%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that FSCCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCCX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 7.11% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 11.38% | +1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.63% | 20.76% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 19.73% | +1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 21.02% | +2.39% |