FSCCX vs. NSBRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX).
FSCCX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Aug 1, 1994. NSBRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Mar 28, 2006.
Performance
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | 0.54% | 3.21% | 14.82% | 11.86% | -12.42% | 35.38% | -4.21% | 17.28% | -20.65% | 6.35% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | -2.40% | 10.03% | 17.56% | 15.08% | -9.63% | 27.17% | 9.79% | 41.88% | -4.36% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCCX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than NSBRX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FSCCX has underperformed NSBRX with an annualized return of 6.83%, while NSBRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.
FSCCX
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 0.27%
- 1Y
- 9.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
NSBRX
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NSBRX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSCCX vs. NSBRX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCCX
NSBRX
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) and Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCCX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.81 | 0.97 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.14 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.82 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.90 | 3.53 | -1.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCCX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.61 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.66 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.75 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCCX and NSBRX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Dividend Comparison
FSCCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than NSBRX's 9.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCCX Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund | 1.09% | 1.09% | 1.52% | 1.02% | 1.24% | 0.52% | 0.54% | 1.16% | 4.21% | 1.03% | 2.63% | 1.80% |
NSBRX Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund | 9.19% | 9.26% | 6.82% | 3.01% | 3.58% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 15.68% | 7.04% | 4.57% | 1.75% | 6.24% |
Drawdowns
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCCX drawdown since its inception was -65.90%, which is greater than NSBRX's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCCX and NSBRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCCX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.90% | -45.14% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -10.75% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -19.79% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.80% | -33.69% | -20.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.40% | -6.10% | -1.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.45% | -5.28% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 2.50% | +1.82% |
Volatility
FSCCX vs. NSBRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund (FSCCX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Nuveen Dividend Growth Fund (NSBRX) at 4.11%. This indicates that FSCCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCCX | NSBRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.11% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 7.73% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.69% | 15.14% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 14.29% | +6.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.41% | 16.59% | +6.82% |