FSCC vs. SMCP
FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) and SMCP (AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FSCC is actively managed, while SMCP is passively managed. FSCC charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SMCP.
Performance
FSCC vs. SMCP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
FSCC
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.53%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 40.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCP
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSCC vs. SMCP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | -2.21% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% |
FSCC vs. SMCP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCC vs. SMCP — Risk / Return Rank
FSCC
SMCP
FSCC vs. SMCP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF (SMCP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCC | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.00 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.75 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCC | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | — | — |
Drawdowns
FSCC vs. SMCP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCC drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, which is greater than SMCP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCC and SMCP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCC | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | 0.00% | -27.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | 0.00% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | 0.00% | -5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | — | — |
Volatility
FSCC vs. SMCP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSCC | SMCP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.22% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.71% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.05% | 0.00% | +22.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 0.00% | +22.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 0.00% | +22.66% |
Dividends
FSCC vs. SMCP - Dividend Comparison
FSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while SMCP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.16% |
SMCP AlphaMark Actively Managed Small Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |