FSCC vs. FYX
FSCC (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF) and FYX (First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FSCC is actively managed, while FYX is passively managed. Over the past year, FSCC returned 38.08% vs 43.61% for FYX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FSCC charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for FYX.
Performance
FSCC vs. FYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSCC achieves a 15.26% return, which is significantly lower than FYX's 18.13% return.
FSCC
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FYX
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 18.02%
- 1Y
- 43.61%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
FSCC vs. FYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 15.26% | 15.30% | 2.19% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 18.13% | 12.68% | 1.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSCC and FYX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FSCC and FYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
FSCC vs. FYX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FSCC
FYX
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
FSCC
FYX
Healthcare
FSCC
FYX
Financial Services
FSCC
FYX
Technology
FSCC
FYX
Real Estate
FSCC
FYX
Consumer Cyclical
FSCC
FYX
Energy
FSCC
FYX
Basic Materials
FSCC
FYX
Consumer Defensive
FSCC
FYX
Communication Services
FSCC
FYX
Utilities
FSCC
FYX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSCC vs. FYX — Risk / Return Rank
FSCC
FYX
FSCC vs. FYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) and First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSCC | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 5.80 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.67 | 18.69 | -6.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSCC | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 2.41 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.36 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
FSCC vs. FYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSCC drawdown since its inception was -27.17%, smaller than the maximum FYX drawdown of -61.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSCC and FYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSCC | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.17% | -61.80% | +34.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.07% | -7.56% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.90% | -1.48% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -10.89% | +5.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.34% | +0.67% |
Volatility
FSCC vs. FYX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF (FSCC) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FYX) at 4.71%. This indicates that FSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSCC | FYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.62% | 4.71% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.36% | 12.03% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 18.28% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 21.96% | +0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 24.21% | -1.91% |
FSCC vs. FYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSCC has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FYX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSCC vs. FYX - Dividend Comparison
FSCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than FYX's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSCC Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core ETF | 0.23% | 0.27% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FYX First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund | 0.69% | 0.64% | 1.62% | 1.22% | 0.95% | 0.99% | 0.65% | 1.12% | 1.08% | 0.60% | 0.94% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, FSCC and FYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSCC has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to FYX (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSCC dropped -27.17% vs FYX's -61.80%.
On 1-year performance, FYX leads with 43.61% vs 38.08% for FSCC. On fees, FSCC is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, FYX has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FYX has performed better with a 43.61% return vs 38.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSCC is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FYX.
FYX has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.23% for FSCC.
They also come from different issuers: Federated Hermes and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for FSCC and 0.63% for FYX.
FYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FSCC and FYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer