FSBW vs. WMT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) and Walmart Inc. (WMT).

Performance

FSBW vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FSBW vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSBW FS Bancorp, Inc.	-5.63%	3.75%	14.30%	14.11%	2.42%	24.78%	-12.42%	50.66%	-20.65%	53.26%
WMT Walmart Inc.	11.78%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	1.97%	23.32%	30.16%	-3.43%	46.56%

Fundamentals

EPS FSBW : $6.50 WMT : $2.73
PE Ratio FSBW : 5.94 WMT : 45.54
PEG Ratio FSBW : 10.96 WMT : 2.97
PS Ratio FSBW : 0.94 WMT : 1.40
Total Revenue (TTM) FSBW : $211.12M WMT : $713.16B
Gross Profit (TTM) FSBW : $104.74M WMT : $177.77B
EBITDA (TTM) FSBW : $40.25M WMT : $48.50B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSBW achieves a -5.63% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 11.78% return. Over the past 10 years, FSBW has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 14.12%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 20.48% annualized return.

FSBW

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: -5.63%
• 6M: -1.95%
• 1Y: 5.05%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 5.64%
• 10Y*: 14.12%

WMT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.67%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 21.08%
• 1Y: 42.82%
• 3Y*: 37.81%
• 5Y*: 24.04%
• 10Y*: 20.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FSBW vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSBW

FSBW Risk / Return Rank: 46
FSBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FSBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
FSBW Omega Ratio Rank: 40
FSBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FSBW Martin Ratio Rank: 51

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 90
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSBW vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FSBW	WMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	1.78	-1.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	2.72	-2.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.34	-0.28
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.34	4.33	-3.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.82	11.97	-11.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FSBW vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSBW Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSBW and WMT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FSBW	WMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	1.78	-1.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	1.15	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.95	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.64	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FSBW and WMT is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FSBW vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

FSBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than WMT's 0.77% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSBW FS Bancorp, Inc.	3.50%	3.25%	2.58%	2.71%	2.69%	1.65%	1.53%	1.02%	1.24%	0.79%	1.03%	1.04%
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.77%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%

Drawdowns

FSBW vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSBW drawdown since its inception was -53.96%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSBW and WMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSBW	WMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.96%	-77.14%	+23.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.02%	-10.92%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.66%	-25.74%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.96%	-25.74%	-28.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.66%	-6.99%	-10.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.49%	-14.66%	+4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.15%	3.95%	+2.20%

Volatility

FSBW vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

FS Bancorp, Inc. (FSBW) has a higher volatility of 10.09% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 5.96%. This indicates that FSBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSBW	WMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.09%	5.96%	+4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.70%	17.03%	+3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.02%	24.35%	+4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.41%	21.09%	+8.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.62%	21.70%	+11.92%

Financials

FSBW vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FS Bancorp, Inc. and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

FSBW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FS Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 50.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 47.04B and revenue of 190.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.7%.

FSBW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FS Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 50.78M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 8.71B and revenue of 190.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.6%.

FSBW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, FS Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 8.42M and revenue of 50.78M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 4.24B and revenue of 190.66B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.