PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAVX vs. USLUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAVX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than USLUX's -4.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAVX has outperformed USLUX with an annualized return of 10.97%, while USLUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.


FSAVX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.94%
YTD
-0.98%
6M
-7.03%
1Y
2.32%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
10.97%

USLUX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.63%
YTD
-4.45%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
10.00%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAVX
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio
-0.98%8.01%6.15%32.55%-37.45%28.99%63.22%28.87%-13.78%24.00%
USLUX
U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund
-4.45%17.87%14.26%23.79%-23.91%25.14%20.76%13.72%-8.30%19.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAVX and USLUX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.72

The correlation between FSAVX and USLUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAVX vs. USLUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAVX
FSAVX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FSAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

USLUX
USLUX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
USLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
USLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
USLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
USLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSAVXUSLUXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.07

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.39

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.46

1.10

-0.64

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the USLUX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAVX and USLUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSAVXUSLUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.32

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.29

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.50

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.19

+0.20

Drawdowns

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAVX drawdown since its inception was -81.27%, roughly equal to the maximum USLUX drawdown of -77.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAVX and USLUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAVXUSLUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.27%

-77.61%

-3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.11%

-15.68%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

-20.96%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.86%

-33.85%

-8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.28%

-34.51%

-8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.63%

-6.88%

-3.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-42.09%

+28.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.87%

5.54%

+2.33%

Volatility

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) is 6.08%, while U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund (USLUX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that FSAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USLUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAVXUSLUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

6.94%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.42%

14.72%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.44%

19.18%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.75%

20.88%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

19.68%

+4.37%

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than USLUX's 1.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAVX vs. USLUX - Dividend Comparison

FSAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, less than USLUX's 8.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAVX
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio
5.73%0.00%0.85%0.86%2.61%2.58%8.57%4.08%7.97%15.51%7.13%16.06%
USLUX
U.S. Global Investors Global Luxury Goods Fund
8.25%7.88%9.94%2.71%6.40%15.37%0.12%2.31%16.18%13.87%8.35%8.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAVX and USLUX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USLUX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to FSAVX (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAVX dropped -81.27% vs USLUX's -77.61%.

USLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAVX and USLUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer