FSAVX vs. FSRPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX).
FSAVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 29, 1986. FSRPX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | -9.58% | 8.01% | 6.15% | 32.55% | -37.45% | 28.99% | 63.22% | 28.87% | -13.78% | 24.00% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | -4.91% | -4.15% | 23.28% | 26.94% | -29.44% | 18.25% | 44.27% | 26.33% | 4.58% | 25.55% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAVX achieves a -9.58% return, which is significantly lower than FSRPX's -4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAVX has underperformed FSRPX with an annualized return of 9.76%, while FSRPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.47% annualized return.
FSAVX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- -9.58%
- 6M
- -17.80%
- 1Y
- 1.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
FSRPX
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -14.41%
- 1Y
- -0.61%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 11.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSAVX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSRPX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FSAVX vs. FSRPX — Risk / Return Rank
FSAVX
FSRPX
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) and Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSAVX | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | -0.01 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.30 | 0.15 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.02 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | -0.14 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | -0.38 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSAVX | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | -0.01 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | 0.08 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.53 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.63 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAVX and FSRPX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Dividend Comparison
FSAVX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.20%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAVX Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 0.86% | 2.61% | 2.58% | 8.57% | 4.08% | 7.97% | 15.51% | 7.13% | 16.06% |
FSRPX Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio | 9.20% | 8.75% | 12.41% | 7.40% | 2.90% | 15.92% | 6.82% | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.37% | 0.14% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAVX drawdown since its inception was -81.27%, which is greater than FSRPX's maximum drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAVX and FSRPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAVX | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.27% | -55.75% | -25.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.11% | -17.79% | -1.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -39.01% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.28% | -39.01% | -4.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.39% | -17.40% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -9.09% | -4.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.06% | 6.42% | -0.36% |
Volatility
FSAVX vs. FSRPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Select Automotive Portfolio (FSAVX) has a higher volatility of 6.68% compared to Fidelity Select Retailing Portfolio (FSRPX) at 5.08%. This indicates that FSAVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSAVX | FSRPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | 5.08% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.68% | 16.32% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.87% | 23.42% | -0.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.64% | 22.68% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 21.56% | +2.43% |