PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAKX vs. AFNIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund (FSAKX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FSAKX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.47%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.32%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFNIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FSAKX
Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund
12.08%11.58%13.73%
AFNIX
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
1.74%11.36%4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAKX and AFNIX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024

0.53

The correlation between FSAKX and AFNIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAKX vs. AFNIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAKX
FSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AFNIX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund (FSAKX) and AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I (AFNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSAKXAFNIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.38

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSAKXAFNIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

Drawdowns

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAKXAFNIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

Volatility

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAKXAFNIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.01%

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAKX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than AFNIX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAKX vs. AFNIX - Dividend Comparison

FSAKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than AFNIX's 31.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFNIX
AAM/Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth Fund Class I
31.18%14.13%6.88%3.43%4.61%1.78%1.75%2.13%2.04%1.72%1.79%2.66%
FSAKX
Strategic Advisers U.S. Total Stock Fund
2.70%3.02%11.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAKX and AFNIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAKX and AFNIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer