PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FSAAX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A (FSAAX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSAAX achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAAX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 8.56%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


FSAAX

1D
0.43%
1M
3.83%
YTD
10.25%
6M
11.01%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
8.56%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A
10.25%16.24%9.13%14.38%-16.42%11.48%15.71%20.23%-6.88%14.98%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FSAAX and NASDX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2007

0.86

The correlation between FSAAX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FSAAX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSAAX
FSAAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FSAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FSAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A (FSAAX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FSAAXNASDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.56

2.70

-0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

3.51

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

3.65

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.36

14.16

+0.20

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSAAX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FSAAXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.70

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.89

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

1.00

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.33

+0.20

Drawdowns

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSAAX drawdown since its inception was -41.63%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAAX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FSAAXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.63%

-83.16%

+41.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-11.90%

+4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.99%

-22.71%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.62%

-35.33%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.38%

-35.33%

+10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.58%

-34.37%

+28.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.06%

-1.44%

Volatility

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A (FSAAX) is 3.03%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.51%. This indicates that FSAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FSAAXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

4.51%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

12.19%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.13%

16.10%

-6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.79%

23.06%

-12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.98%

22.68%

-11.70%

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSAAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FSAAX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

FSAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSAAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 60% Fund Class A
5.06%5.57%2.99%1.64%4.12%2.27%1.60%3.83%4.15%1.78%0.20%3.80%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


FSAAX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to FSAAX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSAAX dropped -41.63% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FSAAX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer