PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FRXD.L is traded in EUR, while CMB1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMB1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRXD.L achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than CMB1.L's 20.34% return.


FRXD.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.52%
6M
10.24%
YTD
11.06%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
19.64%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*

CMB1.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
1.47%
6M
17.90%
YTD
20.34%
1Y
37.10%
3Y*
28.04%
5Y*
21.64%
10Y*
16.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
11.06%24.01%12.76%10.32%-0.01%17.27%-4.30%24.47%-9.31%-0.60%
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
20.34%36.33%18.72%33.45%-8.53%25.99%-4.00%32.77%-14.85%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between FRXD.L and CMB1.L is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2017

0.64

The correlation between FRXD.L and CMB1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (3 years) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRXD.L
FRXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRXD.LCMB1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.43

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

3.95

+1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.52

14.30

-0.78

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRXD.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRXD.L and CMB1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRXD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.42%, smaller than the maximum CMB1.L drawdown of -52.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRXD.L and CMB1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRXD.LCMB1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.42%

-52.45%

+17.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.30%

-9.35%

+6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.26%

-17.56%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.39%

-25.02%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-0.85%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-14.46%

+10.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

2.59%

-1.20%

Volatility

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRXD.L) is 2.57%, while iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that FRXD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMB1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRXD.LCMB1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

3.70%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.82%

12.43%

-5.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.72%

15.22%

-6.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.25%

18.12%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.50%

20.25%

-6.75%

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRXD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CMB1.L's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRXD.L vs. CMB1.L - Dividend Comparison

FRXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, while CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
3.98%4.28%4.30%5.00%5.20%4.63%3.53%4.42%5.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRXD.L and CMB1.L have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRXD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRXD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

FRXD.L tracks Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF, while CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FRXD.L and 0.33% for CMB1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRXD.L and CMB1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer