FRWD vs. XT
FRWD (Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. FRWD is actively managed, while XT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRWD charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
FRWD vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FRWD
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 18.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XT
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- YTD
- 20.20%
- 6M
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 14.70%
FRWD vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 35.15% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 16.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRWD and XT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2026 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRWD vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
FRWD
XT
FRWD vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRWD | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.98 | 0.66 | +3.33 |
Drawdowns
FRWD vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRWD drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum XT drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRWD and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRWD | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.49% | -34.41% | +15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -0.47% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.28% | -7.41% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility
FRWD vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRWD | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.96% | 15.99% | +13.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 20.76% | +9.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 20.08% | +9.88% |
FRWD vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRWD vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
FRWD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRWD Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 6.61% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRWD and XT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XT is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XT is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FRWD.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 6.61%, compared with 0.00% for FRWD.
They also come from different issuers: Nomura and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FRWD and 0.46% for XT.
Find the right allocation for FRWD and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer