PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRWD vs. AIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRWD vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FRWD

1D
-0.33%
1M
4.81%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AIS

1D
-0.40%
1M
12.41%
YTD
112.52%
6M
111.68%
1Y
190.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRWD vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FRWD and AIS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026

0.88

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRWD vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRWD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AIS
AIS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRWD vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRWDAISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.93

FRWD vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRWD vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRWD drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum AIS drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRWD and AIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRWDAISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-32.78%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-9.21%

+3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.13%

-5.49%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

Volatility

FRWD vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRWDAISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.97%

41.62%

-7.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.97%

41.04%

-7.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.97%

41.04%

-7.07%

FRWD vs. AIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRWD has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AIS's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRWD vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRWD nor AIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FRWD and AIS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRWD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRWD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIS.

FRWD and AIS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Nomura and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FRWD and 0.75% for AIS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRWD and AIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer