PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRVAX vs. NMTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Virginia Tax Free Income Fund (FRVAX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRVAX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly lower than NMTRX's 2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, FRVAX has underperformed NMTRX with an annualized return of 1.41%, while NMTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.


FRVAX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.67%
YTD
2.01%
6M
2.39%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
3.96%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
1.41%

NMTRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.80%
YTD
2.58%
6M
3.08%
1Y
8.29%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
0.52%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRVAX
Franklin Virginia Tax Free Income Fund
2.01%3.20%2.81%5.81%-11.33%0.81%3.91%6.28%1.29%1.24%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.58%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between FRVAX and NMTRX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.79

The correlation between FRVAX and NMTRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRVAX vs. NMTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRVAX
FRVAX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FRVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FRVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Virginia Tax Free Income Fund (FRVAX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRVAXNMTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.69

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.14

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.62

11.55

-1.94

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the NMTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRVAX and NMTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRVAXNMTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

2.78

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

0.13

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.54

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

1.00

+0.10

Drawdowns

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRVAX drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, roughly equal to the maximum NMTRX drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRVAX and NMTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRVAXNMTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-16.36%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.50%

-2.65%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.52%

-5.77%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.45%

-16.36%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.45%

-16.36%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.98%

-2.91%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.72%

+0.03%

Volatility

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Virginia Tax Free Income Fund (FRVAX) and Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) have volatilities of 1.22% and 1.25%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRVAXNMTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.25%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.11%

2.25%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

3.01%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

4.03%

+0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.89%

4.40%

-0.51%

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRVAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than NMTRX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRVAX vs. NMTRX - Dividend Comparison

FRVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than NMTRX's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRVAX
Franklin Virginia Tax Free Income Fund
3.07%4.01%3.38%2.44%2.38%1.87%2.21%3.34%3.19%3.05%3.63%3.68%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRVAX and NMTRX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to FRVAX (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRVAX dropped -16.45% vs NMTRX's -16.36%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRVAX and NMTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer