PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQAX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQAX achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FRQAX has outperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 4.67%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.97% annualized return.


FRQAX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.97%
YTD
3.69%
6M
3.95%
1Y
9.39%
3Y*
7.30%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
4.67%

ASFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.36%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.47%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.69%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQAX and ASFYX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.17

Over the past year, FRQAX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.41) than their long-term average of 0.17, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQAX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRQAXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.40

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

5.08

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

18.34

-6.18

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQAX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRQAXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.27

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.21

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.23

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.35

+0.16

Drawdowns

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQAX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, roughly equal to the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQAX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQAXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-36.43%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

-5.24%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.27%

-30.32%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.24%

-36.43%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

-36.43%

+19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-18.22%

+17.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-13.18%

+8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.45%

-0.64%

Volatility

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) is 1.68%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that FRQAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQAXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

3.66%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

9.52%

-6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.16%

11.76%

-7.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

13.76%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

12.71%

-7.38%

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQAX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

FRQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.83%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRQAX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to FRQAX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQAX dropped -38.22% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

FRQAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQAX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer