PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNW vs. WDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNW vs. WDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Western Digital Corporation (WDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 23.12% return, which is significantly lower than WDC's 227.01% return.


FRNW

1D
1.22%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
23.12%
6M
22.47%
1Y
62.88%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
10Y*

WDC

1D
6.35%
1M
16.82%
YTD
227.01%
6M
219.46%
1Y
913.38%
3Y*
164.18%
5Y*
58.50%
10Y*
33.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNW vs. WDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
23.12%53.20%-21.11%-19.64%-11.46%-2.52%
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
227.01%283.68%13.86%65.99%-51.62%15.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNW and WDC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.42

The correlation between FRNW and WDC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNW vs. WDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNW
FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

WDC
WDC Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
WDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDC Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDC Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNW vs. WDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Western Digital Corporation (WDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNWWDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.95

-0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

44.74

-40.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.67

151.81

-136.15

FRNW vs. WDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNW Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is lower than the WDC Sharpe Ratio of 14.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNW and WDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRNW vs. WDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, smaller than the maximum WDC drawdown of -96.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and WDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNWWDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.37%

-96.20%

+36.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-20.59%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.14%

-49.65%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.09%

-5.22%

-5.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-52.07%

+18.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.05%

6.06%

-2.01%

Volatility

FRNW vs. WDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) is 10.63%, while Western Digital Corporation (WDC) has a volatility of 21.76%. This indicates that FRNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNWWDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

21.76%

-11.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

53.55%

-33.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.92%

65.47%

-38.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

48.86%

-20.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.52%

48.62%

-20.10%

Dividends

FRNW vs. WDC - Dividend Comparison

FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than WDC's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
1.02%1.25%1.43%1.30%0.69%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
0.09%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.81%2.36%5.41%2.51%2.94%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNW and WDC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDC has higher volatility (21.76%) compared to FRNW (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNW dropped -59.37% vs WDC's -96.20%.

WDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.07 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNW and WDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer