FRNW vs. PBW
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW).
FRNW and PBW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRNW is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 5, 2021. PBW is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX). It was launched on Mar 3, 2005.
Performance
FRNW vs. PBW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRNW vs. PBW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 13.86% | 53.20% | -21.11% | -19.64% | -11.46% | -2.85% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 3.51% | 53.96% | -30.77% | -20.03% | -44.55% | -3.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly higher than PBW's 3.51% return.
FRNW
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 13.86%
- 6M
- 19.32%
- 1Y
- 82.53%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBW
- 1D
- 4.99%
- 1M
- -2.46%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 102.59%
- 3Y*
- -6.15%
- 5Y*
- -18.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRNW vs. PBW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PBW's 0.61% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRNW vs. PBW — Risk / Return Rank
FRNW
PBW
FRNW vs. PBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRNW | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.06 | 2.41 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.68 | 2.91 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.92 | 4.66 | +2.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.36 | 12.87 | +7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRNW | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.06 | 2.41 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | -0.07 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRNW and PBW is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRNW vs. PBW - Dividend Comparison
FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than PBW's 0.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 1.10% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF | 0.86% | 0.79% | 2.84% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 1.71% | 0.44% | 1.45% | 2.04% | 1.28% | 2.68% | 1.53% |
Drawdowns
FRNW vs. PBW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, smaller than the maximum PBW drawdown of -89.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and PBW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRNW | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.37% | -89.02% | +29.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -21.24% | +9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -84.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -89.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.78% | -73.91% | +56.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -62.86% | +28.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | 7.70% | -3.76% |
Volatility
FRNW vs. PBW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) is 8.61%, while Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a volatility of 12.60%. This indicates that FRNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRNW | PBW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 12.60% | -3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.58% | 31.89% | -12.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 42.85% | -15.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 42.94% | -14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.46% | 38.49% | -10.03% |