PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNW vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNW vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -12.23% return.


FRNW

1D
0.40%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
23.62%
6M
23.50%
1Y
63.53%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
10Y*

MSTY

1D
4.50%
1M
-23.91%
YTD
-12.23%
6M
-15.80%
1Y
-60.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNW vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
23.62%53.20%-7.52%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.23%-42.71%212.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNW and MSTY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNW vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNW
FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNW vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNWMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

0.82

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

-0.84

+5.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.55

-1.25

+16.80

FRNW vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNW Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNW and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRNW vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNWMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.37%

-71.79%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-71.79%

+57.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.73%

-65.49%

+54.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-26.61%

-6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

48.38%

-44.28%

Volatility

FRNW vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) is 10.63%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that FRNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNWMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

19.30%

-8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.59%

49.85%

-30.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.98%

61.63%

-34.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.51%

71.87%

-43.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.51%

71.87%

-43.36%

FRNW vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRNW vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than MSTY's 230.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
1.02%1.25%1.43%1.30%0.69%0.04%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
230.78%294.61%104.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNW and MSTY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to FRNW (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNW dropped -59.37% vs MSTY's -71.79%.

On 1-year performance, FRNW leads with 63.53% vs -60.49% for MSTY. On fees, FRNW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FRNW has been the lower-risk option at 10.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FRNW has performed better with a 63.53% return vs -60.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FRNW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 230.78%, compared with 1.02% for FRNW.

FRNW is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FRNW and 0.99% for MSTY.

FRNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNW and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer