FRNW vs. MSTY
FRNW (Fidelity Clean Energy ETF) and MSTY (YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRNW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while MSTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FRNW returned 63.53% vs -60.49% for MSTY. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRNW charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MSTY.
Performance
FRNW vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -12.23% return.
FRNW
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 23.62%
- 6M
- 23.50%
- 1Y
- 63.53%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTY
- 1D
- 4.50%
- 1M
- -23.91%
- YTD
- -12.23%
- 6M
- -15.80%
- 1Y
- -60.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRNW vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 23.62% | 53.20% | -7.52% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -12.23% | -42.71% | 212.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRNW and MSTY is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRNW vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank
FRNW
MSTY
FRNW vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRNW | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.82 | +0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | -0.84 | +5.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | -1.25 | +16.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRNW vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, smaller than the maximum MSTY drawdown of -71.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and MSTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRNW | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.37% | -71.79% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -71.79% | +57.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.73% | -65.49% | +54.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.15% | -26.61% | -6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 48.38% | -44.28% |
Volatility
FRNW vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) is 10.63%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 19.30%. This indicates that FRNW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRNW | MSTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.63% | 19.30% | -8.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 49.85% | -30.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.98% | 61.63% | -34.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 71.87% | -43.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.51% | 71.87% | -43.36% |
FRNW vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRNW vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison
FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than MSTY's 230.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 1.02% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.04% |
MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 230.78% | 294.61% | 104.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRNW and MSTY have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTY has higher volatility (19.30%) compared to FRNW (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNW dropped -59.37% vs MSTY's -71.79%.
On 1-year performance, FRNW leads with 63.53% vs -60.49% for MSTY. On fees, FRNW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FRNW has been the lower-risk option at 10.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FRNW has performed better with a 63.53% return vs -60.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FRNW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.
MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 230.78%, compared with 1.02% for FRNW.
FRNW is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FRNW and 0.99% for MSTY.
FRNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRNW and MSTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer