FRNW vs. APWEX
FRNW (Fidelity Clean Energy ETF) and APWEX (Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund) are both funds - FRNW is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while APWEX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Cavanal Hill funds. Over the past 3 years, FRNW returned 10.12%/yr vs 26.32%/yr for APWEX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRNW charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for APWEX.
Performance
FRNW vs. APWEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 34.11% return, which is significantly higher than APWEX's 32.00% return.
FRNW
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 34.11%
- 6M
- 34.18%
- 1Y
- 86.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APWEX
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 32.00%
- 6M
- 26.88%
- 1Y
- 47.25%
- 3Y*
- 26.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
FRNW vs. APWEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 34.11% | 53.20% | -21.11% | -19.64% | -11.46% | -2.85% |
APWEX Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund | 32.00% | 21.35% | 13.22% | 4.57% | 32.44% | -2.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRNW and APWEX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2021 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRNW vs. APWEX — Risk / Return Rank
FRNW
APWEX
FRNW vs. APWEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRNW | APWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.47 | 7.83 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.29 | 22.68 | +0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRNW | APWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39 | 2.83 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.34 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
FRNW vs. APWEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, roughly equal to the maximum APWEX drawdown of -61.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and APWEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRNW | APWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.37% | -61.57% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -6.46% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.27% | -23.02% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -3.16% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.33% | -17.06% | -16.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.22% | +1.49% |
Volatility
FRNW vs. APWEX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund (APWEX) at 5.82%. This indicates that FRNW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APWEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRNW | APWEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.16% | 5.82% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.79% | 13.15% | +4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.61% | 17.91% | +7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 25.82% | +2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 25.85% | +2.50% |
FRNW vs. APWEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRNW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than APWEX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRNW vs. APWEX - Dividend Comparison
FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, more than APWEX's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APWEX Cavanal Hill World Energy Fund | 0.57% | 0.45% | 1.80% | 1.54% | 1.95% | 1.44% | 1.54% | 2.57% | 1.26% | 0.43% | 0.97% | 0.67% |
FRNW Fidelity Clean Energy ETF | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRNW and APWEX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRNW has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to APWEX (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNW dropped -59.37% vs APWEX's -61.57%.
FRNW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRNW and APWEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer