FRNKX vs. FIMVX
FRNKX (Frank Value Fund) and FIMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FRNKX returned 11.72%/yr vs 8.64%/yr for FIMVX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRNKX charges 1.37%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FIMVX.
Performance
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRNKX achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than FIMVX's 15.21% return.
FRNKX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 6M
- 9.98%
- 1Y
- 16.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
FIMVX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 3.80%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- 27.24%
- 3Y*
- 17.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRNKX Frank Value Fund | 10.33% | 12.05% | 19.31% | 14.88% | 4.23% | 6.46% | 12.84% | 1.48% |
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund | 15.21% | 11.01% | 13.02% | 12.75% | -12.08% | 28.21% | 4.74% | 7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRNKX and FIMVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FRNKX and FIMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRNKX vs. FIMVX — Risk / Return Rank
FRNKX
FIMVX
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRNKX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 3.79 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 14.28 | -7.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRNKX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 2.17 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.50 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.51 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRNKX drawdown since its inception was -97.09%, which is greater than FIMVX's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNKX and FIMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRNKX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.09% | -43.61% | -53.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.95% | -7.52% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.09% | -20.40% | -76.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.09% | -21.23% | -75.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.87% | 0.00% | -95.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -6.43% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 2.00% | +0.71% |
Volatility
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Volatility Comparison
Frank Value Fund (FRNKX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) at 3.45%. This indicates that FRNKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRNKX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.45% | +0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 9.56% | +1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 13.16% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1,805.06% | 17.32% | +1,787.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,276.60% | 21.84% | +1,254.76% |
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRNKX has a 1.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FIMVX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRNKX vs. FIMVX - Dividend Comparison
FRNKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than FIMVX's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund | 2.15% | 2.48% | 4.44% | 1.89% | 2.75% | 5.62% | 1.23% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRNKX Frank Value Fund | 10.86% | 11.98% | 4.63% | 10.14% | 8.10% | 4.93% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 3.23% | 0.00% | 3.00% | 7.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRNKX and FIMVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRNKX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FIMVX (3.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNKX dropped -97.09% vs FIMVX's -43.61%.
FIMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRNKX and FIMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer