PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EUR Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (FRNE.DE) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNE.DE achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly higher than CBU0.DE's -0.89% return.


FRNE.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.14%
1Y
2.67%
3Y*
3.51%
5Y*
10Y*

CBU0.DE

1D
0.17%
1M
0.91%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
2.45%
3Y*
3.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FRNE.DE
Amundi EUR Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF
1.04%2.63%4.47%3.11%
CBU0.DE
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc
-0.89%4.58%-0.25%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNE.DE and CBU0.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNE.DE
FRNE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FRNE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CBU0.DE
CBU0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EUR Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (FRNE.DE) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRNE.DECBU0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.09

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.32

0.58

+7.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.27

1.62

+42.66

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNE.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the CBU0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNE.DE and CBU0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRNE.DECBU0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

0.48

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.00

0.45

+1.55

Drawdowns

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNE.DE drawdown since its inception was -1.23%, smaller than the maximum CBU0.DE drawdown of -6.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNE.DE and CBU0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNE.DECBU0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.23%

-6.02%

+4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.32%

-4.20%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.51%

-4.20%

+3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.03%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-1.65%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

1.52%

-1.46%

Volatility

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EUR Floating Rate Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (FRNE.DE) is 0.29%, while iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that FRNE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBU0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNE.DECBU0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

2.00%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.89%

4.39%

-3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13%

5.11%

-3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.17%

5.81%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.17%

5.81%

-4.64%

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRNE.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CBU0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRNE.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither FRNE.DE nor CBU0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNE.DE and CBU0.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRNE.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRNE.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.

FRNE.DE tracks iBoxx MSCI ESG EUR FRN Investment Grade Corporates TCA Index, while CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for FRNE.DE and 0.25% for CBU0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNE.DE and CBU0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer